ArticleBMJ open2026
Beyond the stigma: a community-based mixed methods hybrid photovoice-appreciative inquiry protocol to explore and enhance engagement of young men in mental health research.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionYoung men's mental health is a continuing concern but remains underrepresented in both mental health services and research. Engaging young men in mental health research has proven difficult, but creative, strength-based and participatory methods may help overcome barriers and enhance understanding of how best to involve them. This study aims to explore young men's perceptions of how healthcare and academic settings can better engage them in mental health research, and to examine whether participatory, strength-based approaches themselves foster greater engagement. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This convergent mixed-methods participatory-informed study integrates photovoice with appreciative inquiry (AI) within a four-phase AI cycle: Discovery (photovoice-led exploration of 'what works' in engaging with research), Dream (co-imagining desirable engagement experiences), Design (co-creating practical engagement resources and practices) and Deploy (planning how to test and refine these practices). Participants will be young men aged approximately 18-25 years, recruited through community organisations and primary-care-adjacent networks.Data will include photographs with captions and written captions (Discovery), workshop transcriptions (Dream/Design/Deploy). Qualitative data will undergo reflexive thematic analysis, incorporating participatory sense-making through member reflections. Quantitative data will analyse pre-post changes on engagement and empowerment measures, which will be summarised with means, medians and bias-corrected bootstrapped 95% CIs, with exploratory non-parametric tests where appropriate. Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed through recruitment, retention, data completeness and satisfaction metrics. Adverse events and distress responses will be monitored and reported. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the University of Exeter Ethics Committee (Ref 10981599). Safeguards include staged written consent, image ownership and usage agreements, anonymisation and a distress and safeguarding protocol with supported signposting. All participants will provide informed consent, and data will be managed in accordance with GDPR and university information governance policies. Findings will be shared with participants and community partners, published in peer-reviewed outlets and developed into a replicable engagement toolkit for wider use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.