ArticleBone & joint open2026
Forecasting knee arthroplasty surgery with deep learning : an integrated approach using routine clinical data and radiographs.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: We aimed to develop and validate a practical deep learning model integrating commonly collected clinical data and knee radiographs to predict the need for knee arthroplasty (total or partial) in patients with, or at risk of, knee osteoarthritis, as well as the time to surgery. Methods: Data from the Multicentre Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) and the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) were used. The MOST dataset, comprising 3,026 patients, was the primary training and testing cohort, while the OAI dataset provided external validation. The final architecture was based on DenseNet-201, with a head that combined outputs from the radiological analysis with commonly collected clinical data. Model evaluation used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Results: The integration of clinical and radiological data significantly improved predictive accuracy. The combined model achieved an AUROC of 0.85 and AUPRC of 0.62, outperforming models using either data source alone. External validation with the OAI dataset yielded an AUROC of 0.79, confirming the model's generalizability. The AUROC and AUPRC for surgical interventions within 40 months was 0.83 and 0.26, respectively, on the validation dataset, demonstrating higher predictive accuracy for earlier surgical needs. Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of deep learning models, which integrate clinical and radiological data, to predict the need for knee arthroplasty. The robust performance and generalizability of the developed model could streamline clinical pathways and predict local demand for surgery during the next three years. This will facilitate resource planning for providers and accurate and timely access to surgical interventions for patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.