Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42442756›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2026

Forecasting knee arthroplasty surgery with deep learning : an integrated approach using routine clinical data and radiographs.

Omar Musbahi, Thomas A G Hall, Alexis Alibert, Gareth G Jones, Justin Cobb, Richard J van Arkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Omar MusbahiMSk Lab, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4095-0989
Thomas A G HallBiomechanics Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alexis AlibertBiomechanics Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Gareth G JonesMSk Lab, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Justin CobbMSk Lab, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Richard J van ArkelBiomechanics Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) Second RenewalU01AG019069 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NEVITT, MICHAEL C · 2001 to 2020
$21.7M
Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) Second Renewal: Iowa Clinical CenterU01AG018832 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SEGAL, NEIL A, TORNER, JAMES C · 2001 to 2020
$14.1M
Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) Second Renewal - Boston UniversityU01AG018820 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI FELSON, DAVID TOBIN · 2001 to 2019
$13.6M
Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) Second Renewal - UAB Clinical CenterU01AG018947 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LEWIS, CORA E · 2001 to 2020
$13.2M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG018820NIA NIH HHS U01 AG018832NIA NIH HHS U01 AG018947NIA NIH HHS U01 AG019069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: We aimed to develop and validate a practical deep learning model integrating commonly collected clinical data and knee radiographs to predict the need for knee arthroplasty (total or partial) in patients with, or at risk of, knee osteoarthritis, as well as the time to surgery. Methods: Data from the Multicentre Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) and the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) were used. The MOST dataset, comprising 3,026 patients, was the primary training and testing cohort, while the OAI dataset provided external validation. The final architecture was based on DenseNet-201, with a head that combined outputs from the radiological analysis with commonly collected clinical data. Model evaluation used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Results: The integration of clinical and radiological data significantly improved predictive accuracy. The combined model achieved an AUROC of 0.85 and AUPRC of 0.62, outperforming models using either data source alone. External validation with the OAI dataset yielded an AUROC of 0.79, confirming the model's generalizability. The AUROC and AUPRC for surgical interventions within 40 months was 0.83 and 0.26, respectively, on the validation dataset, demonstrating higher predictive accuracy for earlier surgical needs. Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of deep learning models, which integrate clinical and radiological data, to predict the need for knee arthroplasty. The robust performance and generalizability of the developed model could streamline clinical pathways and predict local demand for surgery during the next three years. This will facilitate resource planning for providers and accurate and timely access to surgical interventions for patients.

Identifiers

PMID42442756
PMCPMC13364347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.