ArticleInternational journal of antimicrobial agents2026
Outcomes for persons with triple-class resistant HIV and a history of virologic failure.
Article in International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess outcomes of heavily treatment experienced people with HIV (PWH) who received the antiretroviral therapy salvage regimen containing raltegravir, etravirine, and darunavir/ritonavir (known as TRIO).
methodsData were from the ART Cohort Collaboration, which is a collaboration of European and North American HIV cohort studies. Adult PWH were eligible if they had a history of virologic failure while receiving nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors; three or more primary protease inhibitor and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor mutations; three or fewer darunavir and nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor mutations; received TRIO between 2007 and 2018; virologic failure at TRIO start; and did not receive any TRIO drugs previously. Follow-up began at TRIO start. We examined rates of virologic suppression on TRIO, AIDS/death, receipt of drug-reducing regimens post-TRIO in those virologically suppressed, and subsequent virologic response. We used a competing risks framework to estimate 5-y cumulative incidence of outcomes.
resultsAmong 126 eligible PWH, 24% were female, and median age was 46 y (IQR: 41-50). Median follow-up was 7.9 y (IQR: 5.1-9.3). A total of 94 (74.6%) were virologically suppressed on TRIO. Of these, 26 (28%) subsequently switched to a drug-reducing regimen, of whom 19 of 26 (73.1%) were virologically suppressed at their next viral load measure. The 5-y cumulative incidence of outcomes was stop TRIO and start another three or more drug regimen (39.1%); simplify (16.0%); stop TRIO without switching (8.8%); and death on TRIO (7.2%).
conclusionsAlthough the most common outcome after TRIO was switch to another three or more drug regimen, almost one third of virologically suppressed PWH under TRIO (with a history of multidrug resistance) switched to a drug-reducing regimen, the majority of whom maintained suppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.