ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2026
Exploration of the vein to vein blood transfusion system in three Kenyan counties: a qualitative study.
Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSevere shortages of blood for transfusion are a persistent global health crisis, with the burden disproportionately concentrated in low-income countries. Diverse stakeholder perspectives on blood availability might inform improvements. We aimed to use a comprehensive approach to identify the challenges, facilitators, and innovations within the blood transfusion continuum (BTC) in three different Kenyan settings.
methodsIn this qualitative study, we interrogated the BTC in Siaya, Nakuru, and Turkana counties as part of the Pathways for Innovation in Blood Transfusion Systems in Kenya (PITS Kenya) mixed methods research study. We used purposive sampling, and through interviews and focus group discussions, we solicited perspectives about the challenges, barriers, and facilitating features of the BTC, including any innovations, from health-care workers, hospital administration, government officials, transfused patients, and blood donors aged 18 years and older, who were familiar with the BTC, from Aug 5, 2021, to May 9, 2022. We thematically analysed interview and discussion transcriptions using an iterative approach to achieve saturation of the thematic content. The findings were validated via member checking and stakeholder meetings in Nairobi that included research participants, non-governmental organisations, and Kenyan health authorities.
findings197 participants (84 [43%] female and 113 [57%] male) participated in 74 interviews (76 participants) and 18 focus group discussions (121 participants). Seven themes emerged: (1) massive shortages of blood, (2) mismatches between where blood is stored and where patients need it, (3) reliance on family replacement donors, (4) delays in patient care, (5) stresses to the health-care system and workforce hardship, (6) variable knowledge and attitudes towards blood donation and transfusion, and (7) limited resources. Facilitation of blood transfusion involved local champions through self-organised and community engagement. Innovations advocated for improved resource allocation, education, and collaborative efforts.
interpretationThis study identified BTC challenges, facilitators, and innovations. The participants described the BTC as fragmented in these settings. The most poignant findings revealed how the lack of blood availability caused profound stress on the health system, contributing to delays, inefficiencies, and worry for patient wellbeing. Innovations encouraged collective stewardship and governance of the BTC, bridging communities and health-care facilities.
fundingThe US National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.