ArticleGenetics2026
Haplotype structure: an overlooked key factor shaping the genomic selection response.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic redundancy, a hallmark of polygenic adaptation, implies that new trait optima can be reached by frequency changes of a subset of contributing loci. As a result, the genomic response to selection is often heterogeneous among replicate populations. However, linkage disequilibrium can constrain the genomic response because linked alleles respond jointly, rather than independently. The extent to which haplotype blocks with multiple selection targets shape the genomic response during polygenic adaptation remains unclear. We tested how haplotype structure affects genomic responses to polygenic adaptation with experimental evolution. Three sets of Drosophila simulans lines from the same natural population (supergroups), each with 5 replicates independently adapted to the same novel temperature regime. The genomic response of replicates within the supergroup was more similar than the response of replicates from different supergroups. This pattern is not expected for freely recombining loci, but it is consistent with the central role of haplotype structure in shaping the genomic response. This effect is evident in the stark contrast between supergroups, which is greater than the differentiation caused by adaptation to 2 environments. Replicates from a hot fluctuating environment (28/18 °C) and a hot constant environment (23 °C) clustered together according to supergroup. Computer simulations supported the key role of haplotype structure on the genomic response. Our study highlights the importance of haplotype structure for polygenic selection signatures and further illustrates the stochastic nature of adaptation even when populations adapt to the same selection pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.