Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42441927›Full record

ArticleNeurology2026

Performance of Alzheimer Disease Plasma Biomarkers in Patients With Prion Diseases.

Thomas Coysh, Rhiannon Laban, Elena Veleva, Amanda J Heslegrave, Lee Darwent, Leah Holm-Mercer, Tze How Mok, Melanie Sarah Hart, Michael Peter Lunn, Ashvini Keshavan and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Thomas CoyshMRC Prion Unit at University College London (UCL), UCL Institute of Prion Diseases, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9928-4039
Rhiannon LabanUnited Kingdom Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5926-8357
Elena VelevaUnited Kingdom Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-2440-8163
Amanda J HeslegraveUnited Kingdom Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7290-6405
Lee DarwentMRC Prion Unit at University College London (UCL), UCL Institute of Prion Diseases, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-2196-4097
Leah Holm-MercerMRC Prion Unit at University College London (UCL), UCL Institute of Prion Diseases, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5723-3310
Tze How MokMRC Prion Unit at University College London (UCL), UCL Institute of Prion Diseases, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0141-8412
Melanie Sarah HartNHS Neuroimmunology and CSF Laboratory, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7396-1916
Michael Peter LunnNHS Neuroimmunology and CSF Laboratory, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3174-6027
Ashvini KeshavanDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1043-5721
Jonathan M SchottUnited Kingdom Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2059-024X
Zane JaunmuktaneDivision of Neuropathology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7738-8881
Sebastian BrandnerDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9821-0342
Fernando Gonzalez-OrtizDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7897-9456
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1890-4193
Henrik ZetterbergUnited Kingdom Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3930-4354
John CollingeMRC Prion Unit at University College London (UCL), UCL Institute of Prion Diseases, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2220-7566
Simon MeadMRC Prion Unit at University College London (UCL), UCL Institute of Prion Diseases, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4326-1468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPrion diseases can mimic Alzheimer disease (AD) at presentation. Alzheimer's Association AD diagnostic criteria suggest that a single abnormal highly specific plasma biomarker (including p-tau217) is sufficient for a biological diagnosis. We investigated the performance of AD plasma biomarkers in distinguishing AD and prion diseases.

methodsWe examined plasma biomarker data from patients with prion disease from a prospective cohort study recruited through the UK National Prion Clinic. Prion diseases were diagnosed clinically or with autopsy confirmation, and AD was diagnosed clinically with CSF biomarker confirmation. Plasma p-tau217, p-tau181, Aβ42/40 ratio, brain-derived tau (BD-tau), neurofilament light chain (NfL), and glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) were measured using Simoa. Median biomarker values in different groups were compared with Kruskal-Wallis test, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to compare accuracy in distinguishing prion diseases from sporadic AD (sAD). Lumipulse p-tau217 and NfL were measured in a validation study in a different laboratory.

resultsIn the main study, we analyzed 345 samples from 278 individuals (mean age 58 [SD 13.5], 48.2% female), including 204 with prion diseases (121 sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease [CJD], 11 iatrogenic CJD, 9 variant CJD, 47 slow-progressing inherited prion disease (IPD) and 16 fast-progressing IPD), 33 with AD, and 41 healthy controls. For discriminating prion disease without AD copathology from sAD, none of p-tau217 (area under the curve [AUC] [95% CI] 0.605 [0.486-0.724]), p-tau181 (AUC 0.554 [0.446-0.661]), or GFAP (AUC 0.514 [0.389-0.640]) performed well. Aβ42/40 discriminated moderately (AUC 0.770 [0.684-0.856]). NfL/p-tau217 ratio (AUC 0.996 [0.987-1.000]), NfL (AUC 0.988 [0.974-1.000]), BD-tau/p-tau217 ratio (AUC 0.963 [0.929-0.996]), and BD-tau (AUC 0.934 [0.890-0.978]) discriminated very well. In an independent validation study, consecutive samples were analyzed from 32 patients with sAD and 35 patients with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (mean age 65.0 [SD 6.4], 56.7% female). NfL/p-tau217 again discriminated almost perfectly (AUC 0.986 [95% CI 0.966-1.000]). DISCUSSION: Plasma p-tau217 and p-tau181 are increased in both AD and prion diseases (regardless of burden of AD copathology). Diagnosing AD with a single abnormal p-tau plasma biomarker risks misdiagnosing prion diseases as AD. Plasma NfL/p-tau217 discriminates near-perfectly and could act as a flag to suspect prion diseases where this is a diagnostic possibility. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that plasma NfL/p-tau217 discriminates patients with CJD from those with AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseasePrion Diseasestau ProteinsAgedAged, 80 and overAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersCreutzfeldt-Jakob SyndromeDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurofilament ProteinsPeptide FragmentsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersGlial Fibrillary Acidic Proteinneurofilament protein LNeurofilament ProteinsPeptide Fragmentstau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID42441927
PMCPMC13382852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.