Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42441722›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Genome misassembly detection using Stash: A data structure based on stochastic tile hashing.

Armaghan Sarvar, Lauren Coombe, Inanc Birol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Armaghan SarvarUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-3644
Lauren CoombeBC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
Inanc BirolUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0950-7839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyzing large data from high-throughput sequencing technologies presents significant challenges in terms of memory and computational requirements. It is crucial to develop efficient data structures and computational methods that handle sequencing information. These challenges impact bioinformatics studies, including de novo genome assembly, which serves as a foundation of genomics. Issues like read errors or limitations of heuristic decisions in assembly algorithms lead to genome misassemblies and inaccurate genomic representations, compromising the quality of downstream analyses. Hence, de novo assemblies can benefit from misassembly detection and correction to produce a more optimal assembly. We present Stash, a novel hash-based data structure designed for storing and querying large sequencing data. For an input sequence, Stash uses sliding windows of spaced seed patterns to extract and hash k-mers. The hash values combined with the sequence ID determine the value stored in Stash. A filled Stash can be used to query whether two genomic regions are covered by the same set of reads. This can be used in genome misassembly detection. We demonstrate the effectiveness of Stash in detecting misassemblies in human genome assemblies generated by Flye and Shasta, using Pacbio HiFi reads from the human cell line NA24385. We observed that scaffolding Stash-cut assemblies reduces 7.6% and 3.4% of misassemblies in the Flye and Shasta assemblies, respectively. This is accomplished in 310 minutes utilizing 8 GB of memory. Stash is comparable to alternative long read misassembly correction methods and can result in superior assemblies compared to the baseline.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenome, HumanGenomicsSequence Analysis, DNAAlgorithmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSoftwareStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID42441722
PMCPMC13362140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.