Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42441721›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

cpm: A python library for theory-driven modelling in computational psychiatry.

Lenard Dome, Frank H Hezemans, Kenza Kadri, Ben J Wagner, Andrew Webb, Tobias U Hauser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lenard DomeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7487-1974
Frank H HezemansDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0092-3289
Kenza KadriDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ben J WagnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5401-2512
Andrew WebbMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Tobias U HauserDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Computational Psychiatry Modelling (cpm) toolbox is a Python library for theory-driven modelling in computational psychiatry and cognitive (neuro-)science. cpm integrates a wide range of established approaches into a single framework. It is designed to be accessible to both expert and non-expert modellers in order to conduct cutting-edge computational modelling, while adhering to best practices. The toolbox provides a flexible, modular architecture that adjusts to different needs. It covers a wide range of problems (such as risky decision-making, reward/punishment learning, perceptual metacognition), models (including those based on associative, reinforcement learning, and signal detection theories), and methods (such as hierarchical parameter estimation using empirical and variational Bayesian techniques). Such a customisable toolbox aims to lower the barrier for beginners and to facilitate access to advanced modelling approaches in psychiatry and beyond.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyPsychiatrySoftwareBayes TheoremComputer SimulationDecision MakingHumans

Identifiers

PMID42441721
PMCPMC13379104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.