ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Supervised machine learning-based prediction of modern contraceptive use among sexually active women in Nepal.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern contraceptives play a key role in reducing maternal and infant mortality, preventing unsafe abortions, and advancing women's social and economic participation. Despite their importance, contraceptive use remains uneven across subpopulations in Nepal. This study aimed to identify key predictors of modern contraceptive use among sexually active women using supervised machine learning and data from the 2022 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey. A total weighted sample of 7,090 women residing with their partners was analyzed. Four supervised machine learning models, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, and Logistic Regression, were trained on a balanced dataset. Hyperparameters were optimized through Bayesian optimization. Model performance was assessed on an independent test set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was model evaluation metric. Shapley Additive Explanations quantified predictor importance. The prevalence of modern contraceptive use was 53.70%. Random Forest model achieved the best predictive performance, with highest accuracy and an area under the curve. The most important predictors were fertility preference (0.0737), children ever born (0.0291), secondary or higher education (0.0214), internet use (0.0211), having at least one son (0.0203), contraceptive decision-making (0.0195), Janajati ethnicity (0.0181), age 35-49 years (0.0176), current employment (0.0169), and pregnancy loss history (0.0151). Women who did not desire another child, had children, used the internet, were employed, belonged to the Janajati ethnic group, aged 35-49 years, or had experienced pregnancy loss were more likely to use modern contraceptives. Women who desired another child, lacked formal education, or made contraceptive decisions independently showed a lower likelihood of use. Thus, modern contraceptive use is jointly shaped by demographic, reproductive, and socioeconomic factors. Interventions should prioritize younger women and adolescents, expand digital reproductive health communication, encourage couple engagement in contraceptive decision-making, and implement culturally tailored programs to address disparities across sub-populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.