ArticlePLoS genetics2026
Local ancestry inference with poorly-matched reference panels.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Local ancestry inference with poorly-matched reference panels.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Multiple-testing corrections in case-control studies using identity-by-descent segments.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The original FLARE method provides computationally efficient and highly accurate local ancestry inference in cases where a closely-matched reference panel is available for each ancestry. In this work, we extend FLARE to incorporate a haplotype clustering algorithm that enables accurate local ancestry inference in scenarios where one or more ancestries do not have a closely-matched reference. This method retains the computational efficiency and accuracy of the original FLARE method while greatly extending its applicability. We apply the new method to data from the Mozabite population from the Human Genome Diversity Project. On the autosomes, we find that the Mozabite samples derive 67% of their ancestry from a population related to European and Middle Eastern populations, with the other 33% of their ancestry coming from a population related to West African populations, with an admixture time 48 generations ago. In contrast, on the X chromosome, we find that the individuals have 76% of their ancestry from a population related to European and Middle Eastern populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.