Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42441651›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A dual-stream deep learning architecture for business impact scoring and alert escalation.

Mohammed Saad Javeed, Mst Moushumi Khatun, Jobayar Alom, Rahomotul Islam, Hashibul Ahsan Shoaib

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammed Saad JaveedInformation science, Trine University, Allen Park, Michigan, United States of America.
Mst Moushumi KhatunDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh University of Business and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Jobayar AlomInformation Technology, Washington University of Science and Technology, Alexandria, Virginia, United States of America.
Rahomotul IslamDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh University of Business and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1948-0322
Hashibul Ahsan ShoaibInformation Technology, St. Francis College, Brooklyn, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1212-8690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern network monitoring systems generate massive volumes of telemetry data, yet most existing anomaly detection models fail to prioritize alerts according to their operational urgency and business impact. This limitation results in delayed incident responses and inefficient alert management in Network Operations Centers. To address this gap, this study proposes a Dual-Stream Predictive Alert Escalation Framework that integrates temporal failure pattern learning with business impact-aware alert prioritization. The proposed architecture consists of two key components: a bidirectional temporal encoder for modeling multivariate Key Performance Indicator (KPI) time-series data, and an auxiliary severity encoder that captures contextual metadata related to operational risk and service criticality. The outputs of these two learning streams are combined through an attention-based fusion mechanism, and a Business Impact Scoring (BIS) layer generates impact-weighted escalation decisions for proactive incident management. Experimental evaluations using real-world KPI datasets and the AI4I_2020 predictive maintenance dataset demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed framework compared to baseline methods such as LSTM, GRU, CNN-LSTM, and BiLSTM-VAE. On the combined multivariate KPI dataset, the model achieved a precision of 0.94, a recall of 0.92, and an F1-score of 0.93, along with a PR-AUC of 0.95 and a ROC-AUC of 0.94. Under impact-aware evaluation, the framework attained the highest Impact-Weighted F1 (IW-F1) of 0.85 and BIS accuracy of 0.88, resulting in an estimated 31.6% reduction in operational costs through earlier and more accurate escalation of critical events. The suitability of the selected datasets is justified by their complementary roles: publicly available KPI time-series datasets represent real-world network telemetry behavior, while the AI4I_2020 dataset provides structured severity and operational context, enabling joint evaluation of failure prediction accuracy, escalation timeliness, and business impact modeling. By prioritizing alerts based on impact-aware severity rather than raw anomaly scores, the proposed framework directly supports operational cost reduction through earlier mitigation and improved decision-making in network operations. The proposed approach bridges the gap between anomaly detection and intelligent alert management by incorporating business relevance into predictive modeling. This dual-stream architecture offers a scalable and proactive solution for AIOps-driven network reliability and automated service resilience.

Indexed as

CommerceDeep LearningAlgorithmsHumansLong Short Term MemoryPredictive Learning ModelsTelemetry

Identifiers

PMID42441651
PMCPMC13362152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.