Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42441647›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2026

A novel rat spatial inference task reveals rapid deduction of transitive relationships using schemas and deliberation.

Blake S Porter, Catherine Shi, Evgeniia Kozlova, Shantanu P Jadhav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Blake S PorterDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience Program, Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University.
Catherine ShiUndergraduate Program in Neuroscience, Brandeis University.
Evgeniia KozlovaUndergraduate Program in Neuroscience, Brandeis University.
Shantanu P JadhavDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience Program, Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University.ORCID 0000-0001-5821-0551

Funding

Quantitative Neuroscience: Tools for Bridging Levels of AnalysisT32NS007292 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GINA G TURRIGIANO · 1986 to 2026
$12.7M
Role of physiological patterns in hippocampal-prefrontal interactionsR01MH112661 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI Shantanu P Jadhav · 2017 to 2026
$3.6M
Multiple mechanisms of neural coordination for associative memory processesR01MH120228 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI JADHAV, SHANTANU P · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112661NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120228NINDS NIH HHSNINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007292Smith Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inferential reasoning is a vital cognitive ability that enables animals to navigate novel situations by leveraging existing relational knowledge of memory schema, with hypothesized roles of prefrontal cortical-hippocampal circuits. Transitive inference (TI) tasks test the ability of subjects to infer relationships within a value hierarchy (e.g., A > B > C > D > E) after being trained only on adjacent premise pairs (e.g., A-B, B-C, etc.). In rodents, current TI paradigms are primarily based on odor-cues and have several limitations that preclude investigation of physiological mechanisms underlying schemas and inference-based choice. To address these challenges, we developed a novel, automated spatial TI task for rats using a radial maze with maze arms as premise elements and a dedicated deliberation zone. Most rats successfully learned the premise pairs over training. Further, animals demonstrated rapid, successful inference (test pair B > D and control pair A > E) within a single test session, with higher initial accuracy than comparable premise pairs, indicating the use of schema-based inference. We also investigated vicarious trial-and-error's (VTE), a behavioral correlate of spatial deliberation. VTE behavior was elevated on choice trajectories early in learning, when novel premise pairs were introduced, and generally for incorrect trials, corresponding to the hypothesized association of VTE's with uncertainty. Further, rats also exhibited elevated VTE behavior with high variability during inference testing, with individual variability suggestive of varying strengths of schema usage. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of a rodent spatial TI task that provides new insights into the behavioral correlates of schemas and inference-based choices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Space PerceptionAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorCognitionMaleMaze LearningMemoryRatsRats, Long-Evans

Identifiers

PMID42441647
PMCPMC13367382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.