ArticlePloS one2026
Analyzing public sentiment during national healthcare system failures: A big data approach to emergency department experiences in South Korea.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 2024 healthcare crisis in South Korea, characterized by a mass resignation of medical residents and a subsequent "medical void," has profoundly disrupted the healthcare landscape. This study aims to investigate the emotional responses and behavioral concerns of patients regarding emergency departments (EDs) during this period of systemic instability.
methodsUtilizing AI-based text mining and sentiment analysis, we analyzed a comprehensive dataset of 1,359,146 unstructured data points harvested from major Korean online platforms between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. The analysis focused on quantifying sentiment polarity and identifying core thematic stressors through keyword frequency and association mapping.
resultsThe findings revealed a predominant negative sentiment (45.8%), significantly outweighing positive (32.4%) and neutral (21.9%) responses. Beyond clinical outcomes, specific terms such as "Medical Void," "Emergency Room Runarounds," and "Overtreatment" emerged as primary psychological stressors. Temporal and spatial analyses indicated that dissatisfaction spiked during holidays and nighttime, particularly concentrated in metropolitan areas like Seoul, reflecting critical bottlenecks in the emergency care network.
conclusionsThese results suggest that patient dissatisfaction during a national medical crisis transcends service-level issues, reflecting a deep-seated trust deficit and a perceived threat to psychological safety. This study provides a foundational evidence base for developing data-driven crisis communication systems and policy interventions aimed at restoring public trust and enhancing healthcare system resilience during national emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.