ArticlePsychology of music2026
Breaking with common practice: Exploring modernist musical emotion.
Article in Psychology of music, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the notes: Clarifying the role of expressivity in conveying musical emotion.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026Article
- Analysis from multiple perspectives (AMP): Applying decision hygiene to analysis of musical structure.Musicae scientiae : the journal of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music · 2026Article
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Experimental research on musical emotion has identified clear links between specific aspects of musical structure and emotional responses. However, growing recognition of changes in the affective meaning of specific cues over time raises intriguing questions about the degree to which these links hold across historical eras. In particular, the traditional focus on compositional principles from common-practice period music (ca. 1600-1900) might not capture how emotion is perceived in later compositions. Here we explore perceived emotion ratings in a set of 24 preludes by Dmitri Shostakovich (Op. 34), comparing the effects of cues in his preludes vs. those by Bach and Chopin. We find that prosodic cues (i.e., pitch height, timing) play a stronger role than mode in these pieces. Because music theorists widely recognize Shostakovich's music as tonal, this result reflects not his abandonment of mode, but rather his decision to use it differently than his predecessors. This provides an important perspective complementing a growing body of research using score-based analyses to explore historical changes in the "meaning" of specific cues. Our findings illustrate how modern compositions can provide novel insight into cues' historically changing roles in emotional communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.