ArticleCHEST critical care2026
Black Surrogate Decision-Makers' Perspectives on the American Thoracic Society and Society for Critical Care Medicine Statement on Shared Decision-Making in ICUs.
Article in CHEST critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) published a policy statement recommending communication skills to improve how clinicians support surrogate decision-makers in the ICU that was based on expert opinion and did not include patient or family input. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the perspectives of Black individuals with prior experience as a decision-maker on the ATS and SCCM statement on shared decision-making in ICUs? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsWe convened focus groups with Black individuals who have been surrogate decision-makers in the inpatient or ICU setting. Race-concordant, PhD-trained facilitators conducted the groups, which explored participants' prior experiences as surrogates, then presented a summary of the ATS and SCCM policy statement to elicit their opinions. We developed a codebook using an inductive thematic analysis approach, then double-coded interviews and resolved discrepancies by consensus.
resultsWe conducted 3 focus groups via Zoom (Zoom Video Communications Inc) with 20 participants. Participants described negative experiences communicating with doctors, attributed to racial biases and deficiencies in clinicians' communication skills. Participants generally endorsed the recommendations, including the focus not only on decision support skills, but also on relationship building and emotional support. They offered numerous suggestions for improvement, including (1) broadening the recommendations to apply to the interprofessional clinical team, (2) being receptive and responsive to the communication priorities of families, (3) allowing family more time and space to process information and emotions, (4) presenting all medically reasonable treatment options, (5) centering the family's concept of patient values, rather than the clinicians', and (6) including the entire family in decision-making, if preferred.
interpretationOur results show that participants endorsed the main recommendations in the ATS and SCCM policy statement on shared decision-making in ICUs and highlighted numerous areas for refinement. Participants' perspectives should inform future recommendations to provide more equitable care to Black patients and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.