ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2026
Comparing outcomes of acetabular fracture fixation in early career versus experienced orthopaedic trauma surgeons.
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The goal of this study was to compare clinical and functional outcomes of acetabular fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) by orthopaedic trauma fellowship-trained surgeons in their first 5 years of practice with their more experienced counterparts. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with acetabular fractures treated with ORIF at our level I trauma center from 2018 to 2021. Inclusion criteria included patients 18 years or older with an acetabular fracture treated with ORIF by an early career orthopaedic trauma surgeon in their first 5 years of practice or by a more experienced partner at least 10 years into practice. The primary outcome was fracture reduction quality. Secondary outcomes were operative time, estimated blood loss, reoperations, perioperative 30-day mortality, native hip survivorship, and HOOS JR scores at 1 year. Results: Ninety-nine patients with 100 acetabular fractures were included. The average age was 51.3 ± 19.5 years. Seventy-six percent were male. Sixty-six fractures were treated by early career surgeons, 33 were treated by later career surgeons. The 2 groups were similar in patient demographics, fracture characteristics, operative time, estimated blood loss, reoperation, 30-day mortality, native hip survivorship, and HOOS JR scores. There were no differences in reduction grade between groups (82% vs 90% grade A/B in the early career and later career groups, respectively, Conclusions: Reassuringly, patients with acetabular fractures treated with ORIF by early career surgeons demonstrate comparable outcomes with those treated by more experienced surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.