Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42441286›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Absconding From Nonforensic Psychiatric Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors and Associated Patient Characteristics.

Qaisar Farooq, Afreen Fatima, Ian French, Anwarul Haq

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qaisar FarooqDepartment of Psychiatry, St. Luke's General Hospital, Kilkenny, IRL.
Afreen FatimaDepartment of Psychiatry, St. Luke's General Hospital, Kilkenny, IRL.
Ian FrenchDepartment of Psychiatry, St. Luke's General Hospital, Kilkenny, IRL.
Anwarul HaqDepartment of Psychiatry, St. Luke's General Hospital, Kilkenny, IRL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Absconding from psychiatric inpatient units remains a significant challenge in mental health services and is associated with adverse outcomes, including interruption of treatment, relapse, self-harm, and disruption of continuity of care. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize the main risk factors associated with absconding among nonforensic psychiatric inpatients and to explore how these findings may inform clinical risk assessment and management. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, covering studies published from database inception to December 31, 2025. Studies involving adult patients in nonforensic psychiatric inpatient settings were included if they examined risk factors or patient characteristics associated with absconding. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Younger age was the most consistently reported risk factor across all studies. Other commonly identified factors included schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, involuntary admission status, and the early phase of admission, particularly within the first two weeks. Male sex, environmental influences, poor insight, irritability, and previous absconding were also associated with increased risk. The findings suggest that absconding is a multifactorial phenomenon influenced by demographic, clinical, and environmental variables. Early identification of high-risk patients and implementation of targeted interventions may improve prevention strategies and patient safety in psychiatric inpatient settings.

Indexed as

absconding from psychiatric inpatient settingsdepartment of psychiatrymental health servicespsychiatry and mental healthrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID42441286
PMCPMC13335004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.