ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Structuring the AI-enabled home learning environment: a gatekeeper model of digital capital, trust, and relational support.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: As AI tools increasingly enter family life, parents function as gatekeepers who may shape whether AI becomes part of a governable learning ecology or remains an unregulated convenience. This study examined how family background, digital capital, AI-related beliefs, and relational support are associated with parental behavioral intention and willingness to pay in the AI-enabled home learning environment. Methods: We surveyed 585 Chinese parents of children from preschool through secondary school, and 567 valid responses were analyzed. An associational structural path model with observed composite variables was estimated, linking socioeconomic status, household AI use, parental digital literacy, cultural capital, AI trust, privacy concerns, algorithmic awareness, parental mediation, and home-school collaboration to behavioral intention and willingness to pay. Results: Household AI use was positively associated with parental digital literacy but did not consistently relate to broader digital capital or governance readiness. Socioeconomic status was associated with downstream support primarily through parental digital literacy, which was related to higher trust and, via relational supports, to behavioral intention. Willingness to pay was interpreted more cautiously as a financial-intention outcome. The model explained more variance in behavioral intention than in willingness to pay, and subgroup analyses indicated broadly comparable structural patterns across sample-defined lower- and higher-SES groups. Discussion: These findings suggest that equity-oriented AI-in-education initiatives should prioritize parents' digital capability, calibrated trust, and relational infrastructures that enable families to govern, not merely consume, AI in children's learning. Because the data are cross-sectional, the findings should be interpreted as associations rather than causal pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.