ArticleCureus2026
Reconstruction of a Complex Pretibial Wound Using Dermal Regeneration Template and Split-Thickness Skin Graft.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reconstruction of the distal leg is challenging due to watershed vascularity and scarce soft-tissue bulk. While traditional reconstruction guidelines rely on vascularized flap coverage, such interventions are higher-risk options in certain patients with significant medical co-morbidities. This case report describes non-microsurgical reconstruction of a distal-third pre-tibial wound in a patient with a history of renal transplant, type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, and peripheral vascular disease. In this patient, chronic immunosuppression induced blunt wound healing, while concurrent peripheral artery disease made microsurgery unreliable. We navigated this challenge by "engineering" a wound bed using a dermal regeneration template (DRT) in conjunction with antimicrobial negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Within four weeks, the wound showed robust granulation, with complete coverage of previously exposed tendon. The wound was then covered with a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) eight weeks after the initial application of DRT. The patient returned to his pre-injury functional status within five months. This staged strategy offers a lower-risk alternative to traditional flap-based protocols for patients with significant co-morbidities, including transplant immunosuppression and peripheral arterial disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.