Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42441196›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of plastic surgery2026

Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes of Reduction Mammoplasty for Gigantomastia: Insights from a Multidimensional Patient-Reported Analysis Using BREAST-Q.

Adrian Ranferi Gil-Rabanales, Victor Hugo Garzón-Ortega, Daniela Téllez-Palacios, Fernando Fernández Varela-Gómez, Hernando Alberto Vázquez-Sánchez, Priscila Alejandra Thebar-Moreno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adrian Ranferi Gil-RabanalesDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital General "Dr. Manuel Gea González", Mexico City, Mexico.
Victor Hugo Garzón-OrtegaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital General "Dr. Manuel Gea González", Mexico City, Mexico.
Daniela Téllez-PalaciosDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital General "Dr. Manuel Gea González", Mexico City, Mexico.
Fernando Fernández Varela-GómezFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Hernando Alberto Vázquez-SánchezDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital General "Dr. Manuel Gea González", Mexico City, Mexico.
Priscila Alejandra Thebar-MorenoFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast hypertrophy significantly impairs quality of life, causing musculoskeletal pain, poor posture, and psychological distress, including reduced self-esteem. Reduction mammoplasty offers a surgical approach to mitigate these challenges. We evaluated patient satisfaction with aesthetic and functional outcomes following the procedure at a specialized referral center. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 16 patients who underwent reduction mammoplasty for gigantomastia in the Hospital General "Dr. Manuel Gea González" Mexico City, Mexico from January 1, 2022, to July 31, 2024. Data from medical records included demographics (age, BMI), surgical indications, resected tissue weight, and BREAST-Q responses assessing satisfaction with breast appearance, surgical outcomes, and psychosocial, physical, and sexual well-being. Results: Patients had a mean age of 46.5 years, with 43.7% classified as obese. Physical discomfort was the primary surgical indication (62.5%), and 62.5% had 501-1000 g of tissue resected. High satisfaction was reported for surgical outcomes (87.5%) and physical well-being (93.7%), yet dissatisfaction was notable with breast appearance (56.2%), psychosocial well-being (100%), and sexual well-being (81.2%). Satisfaction with the surgeon was 87.5%, and with other staff, 62.5%. Conclusion: Reduction mammoplasty effectively improves physical health and surgical satisfaction; however, persistent dissatisfaction with aesthetic and psychosocial outcomes highlights the need for enhanced preoperative counseling. Tailored discussions could better align patient expectations with achievable results, improving overall care.

Indexed as

Aesthetic outcomesBREAST-QGigantomastiaPatient satisfactionQuality of lifeReduction mammoplasty;

Identifiers

PMID42441196
PMCPMC13336346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.