Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42441120›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026

Support for immunization-related child tax credit programs: A survey of parents in the United States.

Matthew R Boyce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthew R BoyceTexas A&M School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy & Management, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Describe parental attitudes toward proposed tax credit policies that would promote pediatric immunization coverage in the United States. Methods: A national survey was conducted from August-September 2025. Participants were recruited from an online panel and asked to use Likert scales to characterize support for proposed policies that would: revise the eligibility criteria of the existing federal child tax credit to include age-appropriate immunization, create a new tax credit for parents providing evidence that their children are age-appropriately immunized, or create a new tax credit for families residing in a state where at least 95% of the children are age-appropriately immunized. Results: The data analysis included 1006 participants. 53.9% expressed support for revising the eligibility criteria of existing child tax credits to include age-appropriate immunization. 62.6% expressed support for creating a new tax credit for parents providing evidence that their children are age-appropriate immunized. 57.4% expressed support for creating a new tax credit for families residing in a state where at least 95% of the children are age-appropriately immunized. Support differed according to participant characteristics, but notably, not according to partisanship or welfare program participation. Conclusions: Most parents in this survey supported novel tax policies that may improve immunization coverage.

Indexed as

Child healthHealth policyPublic assistanceTaxesVaccineVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID42441120
PMCPMC13334396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.