Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42441077›Full record

ArticleHealth and human rights2026

From International Commitments to Local Practice: Examining Staff Attitudes Toward Human Rights in Lithuanian Mental Health Care Facilities.

Ugnė Grigaitė, Gintaras Šumskas, Eglė Šumskienė, Karilė Levickaitė, Jurga Mataitytė-Diržienė, Jūratė Charenkova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and human rights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ugnė Grigaitėproject manager and researcher at Mental Health Perspectives, Vilnius, Lithuania, and an integrated member at the Comprehensive Health Research Centre, Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Gintaras Šumskasassociate professor at Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Eglė Šumskienėprofessor at the Institute of Sociology and Social Work, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Karilė Levickaitėdirector at Mental Health Perspectives, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Jurga Mataitytė-Diržienėassociate professor at the Institute of Sociology and Social Work, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Jūratė Charenkovaassociate professor at the Institute of Sociology and Social Work, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the attitudes of mental health care professionals in Lithuania toward human rights principles, provisions, and standards as defined by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and their application in mental health care. Employing a mixed-methods convergent design, the study integrates survey data (n = 390) with qualitative findings from six focus groups with professionals and service users (n = 36). The results reveal notable differences across professional roles, institutional settings, and experience levels. Medical psychologists consistently demonstrated more human rights-supportive attitudes, while nurse assistants and professionals in large inpatient facilities were more likely to endorse coercive practices and question the full implementation of rights in practice. Additionally, mid-career professionals and those working in smaller facilities expressed greater openness to reform and the practical utility of the CRPD. Qualitative findings further highlighted systemic barriers such as stigma, biomedical dominance, and resource constraints. These findings underscore the importance of targeted training, institutional reform, and sustained political will to align Lithuania's mental health care services with international human rights standards. Further longitudinal research is warranted to examine how attitudes toward human rights in mental health care evolve, especially in response to policy changes, reforms, and targeted training initiatives.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHuman RightsMental Health ServicesAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansLithuaniaMaleQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42441077
PMCPMC13334830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.