Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42441019›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioinformatics2026

Connecting links with code: AI in morphological evolution.

Nimisha Singh, Pragya Chaturvedi, Devansh Saxena

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nimisha SinghDepartment of Biotechnology, Dr. B. Lal Institute of Biotechnology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Pragya ChaturvediDepartment of Biotechnology, Dr. B. Lal Institute of Biotechnology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Devansh SaxenaDepartment of Biotechnology, Dr. B. Lal Institute of Biotechnology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary biology and paleontology are based on fossil material of morphological data, i.e., anatomical, size, symmetry, ontogenetic, etc., as the dominant empirical record of the history of life over deep time. Such physical records tie evolutionary histories to the geologic past, guiding evolutionary molecular clock calibrations, phylogenetic speculations and macroevolutionary trends such as adaptive radiations, mass extinctions, morphological stasis and disparity. Additional explanations of the history of biogeography, evolution inside niches and lineage adaptation to environmental disturbances are provided by spatial-temporal variability in the fossil record. Although central, traditional morphological studies are characterized by methodological shortcomings: manual scoring of characters, linear measurements and landmark-based geometric morphometrics which causes subjectivity, homoplasy and absence of data and topological instability in phylogenies. The present review features fields in evolutionary biology and paleontology that can be improved by AI and machine learning developments in processing morphological data, which quantitative shape analysis automates, reduces biases and scales inference, which can prove. We have discovered technical and methodological gaps and have mapped out ways of integrating these tools into strong, repeatable workflows.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningmorphologymorphometric analysisphylogenetics

Identifiers

PMID42441019
PMCPMC13334578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.