Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42441000›Full record

ArticleHealth and human rights2026

Political Contestation of the Right to Health in the United States: Eighty Years of Conservative Opposition to Health and Human Rights.

Benjamin Mason Meier, Darby Mcbride

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Health and human rights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin Mason MeierProfessor of global health policy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.
Darby McbrideStudent in the Community and Global Public Health Program at the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States stands apart from other nations in opposing the right to health under international law, with longstanding conservative opposition to a human right to health holding back policy efforts to realize health care and underlying determinants of health-at home and throughout the world. Over the past 80 years, American conservative ideology has presented persistent political obstacles to the advancement of health as a human right, challenging who is entitled to rights and what those rights entail. This ideological opposition has reframed health as a narrow privilege for some rather than an expansive right for all. Examining the historical evolution of the right to health since the end of World War II, this paper analyzes how shifting conservative opposition over the years has undermined human rights in health policy and culminated in existential challenges for health systems. The paper concludes that the guarantee of health as a human right must be codified as a defining principle of American democracy, enshrining constitutive commitments to health as a foundation for a healthier future under law.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHuman RightsPoliticsRight to HealthHistory, 20th CenturyHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42441000
PMCPMC13334765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.