ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Gated recurrent unit model for forecasting greenhouse gas concentrations with uncertainty quantification.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable and accurate farm-level forecasting of greenhouse gas concentrations from dairy cattle is important to the formulation of climate change mitigation strategies and policy planning in livestock systems. This study proposed an uncertainty-aware deep learning model that integrated data from multiple sources, including remote sensing and ground-based sensors, to forecast hourly concentrations of nitrous oxide, methane, and carbon dioxide in a controlled zero-grazing dairy system. The forecasting was implemented by formulating a causal multivariate time series using a 24-h lookback window with direct one-step-ahead prediction. A two-stage model evaluation protocol, model hyperparameter tuning via rolling cross-validation, and holdout Test Evaluation were implemented during model development. The model was evaluated using the coefficient of determination, root-mean-square error, and mean squared error. To evaluate model reliability, the study employed a dual-output gated recurrent unit to estimate the conditional mean and heteroscedastic variance, and Monte Carlo dropout and Gaussian Negative Log-Likelihood to quantify epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty. Results indicate stable generalisation across temporal folds and strong probabilistic calibration, with empirical 95% coverage ranging from 93.6 to 94.8% on the holdout test set. Feature selection indicates that rainfall, normalised difference vegetation index, humidity, temperature, trend, and season influence the prediction of concentration. The study shows that incorporating exogenous variables improves model performance. The proposed framework demonstrates proof of concept for controlled zero-grazing systems, with potential for broader application following multi-site validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.