ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Pain differences in cognitive impairment appear only during active motor tasks.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive impairment in older adults has been associated with altered pain processing and potentially increased pain vulnerability, although findings are inconsistent. We hypothesized that cognitive impairment has a stronger impact on movement-related pain in everyday contexts than on pain sensitivity assessed in passive laboratory settings. Thirty-eight cognitively healthy and 38 cognitively impaired older adults (50% women; groups age- and sex-matched), classified using the CERAD scale (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease), completed standardized motor tasks (walking, bed mobility, lifting tasks) and experimental pressure and heat pain assessments. Pain intensity (NRS) was recorded for all tasks. Perceived exertion was assessed during motor tasks, and clinical pain status was determined via a structured interview. Groups did not differ in baseline clinical pain or experimental pain sensitivity. However, cognitively impaired participants reported significantly higher movement-related pain during motor tasks. In a blockwise regression model, movement-related pain was significantly predicted by clinical pain and experimental pain sensitivity; however cognitive status (CERAD) explained additional variance to a similar amount. In conclusion, reduced cognitive functioning significantly predicted increased pain during active, everyday motor tasks. This may reflect diminished capacities for recall, planning, and execution of pain-minimizing movement strategies. These findings underscore the importance of assessing pain in behaviorally relevant contexts where movement provokes pain, to better understand pain mechanisms in cognitively impaired older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.