ArticleJournal of veterinary research2026
Assessment of the pathogenicity of
Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Material and Methods: Goslings were divided into three groups and either infected with the goose isolate MG-GD01/22, infected with chicken-derived MG R(low) or left untreated as controls. Clinical scores were recorded, and morbidity/mortality, air-sac lesions and tracheal and lung histopathology evaluated. Isolate membrane proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and screened by Western blot with goose hyper-immune sera. Results: Both MG-GD01/22 and MG R(low) established infection, with morbidity rates of 90% and 80% and qPCR positivity of 100% and 80%, respectively. The MG-GD01/22 isolate caused 20% mortality and more severe respiratory signs, whereas MG R(low) induced milder disease without deaths. Both strains produced airsacculitis and interstitial pneumonia, but MG-GD01/22 caused more marked pulmonary haemorrhage. Gel electrophoresis showed similar bands at 50-130 kDa with differences at 25-50 kDa. Western blot revealed strong immune responses to conserved 75 kDa and 67 kDa proteins, particularly those of MG-GD01/22. Conclusion: Both strains are pathogenic in geese, with MG-GD01/22 exhibiting higher virulence. The conserved 75 kDa and 67 kDa proteins represent promising targets for the development of diagnostic assays and vaccines against
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.