ArticleCureus2026
A Prospective Assessment of Hearing Threshold Variability in Personal Listening Device Users.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim The increasing use of personal listening devices (PLDs), particularly in-ear earphones, has raised concerns regarding their potential adverse effects on auditory health among young adults. Prolonged exposure to high-intensity recreational sound is considered a major risk factor for noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). However, longitudinal evidence evaluating the combined influence of listening duration and volume intensity on hearing thresholds remains limited. This study aimed to prospectively assess hearing threshold variability among PLD users and examine the dose-dependent effects of earphone usage duration and listening volume over an 18-month period. Materials and methods A prospective longitudinal study was conducted among 100 participants aged 18-25 years over 18 months. Participants were categorized into four groups (n=25 each) based on daily earphone usage duration as follows: group A (1-2 h/day), group B (2-4 h/day), group C (>4 h/day), and group D (≤1 h/day/non-users; control). Each group was further stratified according to listening volume intensity (<60%, 60-80%, and >80% based on device volume settings). Baseline demographic details and otology symptoms were recorded using a structured questionnaire. Audiological evaluation was performed using pure-tone audiometry (PTA) at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months under standardized conditions. Statistical analysis was conducted using ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests, with p≤0.05 considered statistically significant. Results A progressive increase in mean hearing thresholds was observed among earphone users over the 18-month follow-up period, with the highest deterioration noted in group C. Mean hearing thresholds increased from 13.36±3.90 dB to 14.92±4.41 dB in group A, from 15.42±4.69 dB to 18.42±4.86 dB in group B, and from 15.02±5.40 dB to 20.30±6.01 dB in group C, whereas minimal variation was observed in the control group (8.58±2.07 dB to 8.86±2.07 dB). Hearing threshold shifts demonstrated a dose-dependent pattern, with the highest shift observed in group C (-5.28±1.73 dB), followed by group B (-3.00±0.95 dB) and group A (-1.56±1.05 dB). Higher listening volume (>80%) was significantly associated with greater auditory decline and increased prevalence of otology symptoms such as tinnitus and ear pain. Significant intergroup differences were observed (p=0.001). Conclusion Prolonged and high-volume use of in-ear earphones was associated with progressive hearing threshold shifts among young adults, suggesting early auditory changes consistent with recreational noise exposure. Both listening duration and volume intensity emerged as important modifiable risk factors. The findings highlight the importance of safe listening practices, early auditory screening, and public health awareness strategies to reduce the potential risk of NIHL associated with personal listening device usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.