Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42440843›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026

Parental age and age gap in relation to neonatal health: a cohort study in eastern China.

Xuezhi Zhao, Siyuan Qian, Yongran Cheng, Weiguo Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xuezhi ZhaoDepartment of Gynecology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Siyuan QianSchool of Laboratory Medicine and School of Bioengineering, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Yongran ChengSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Weiguo LuDepartment of Gynecology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the association between parental age, age gap, and neonatal health outcomes, and to provide epidemiological evidence for preconception counseling and perinatal risk assessment. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included mother-infant pairs who delivered at the Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine between January 2016 and December 2022. A total of 15,762 pairs were analyzed, comprising 7,557 healthy controls and 8,205 cases. The primary exposure was parental age comparison. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between parental age comparison and neonatal diseases, with adjustment for maternal BMI, hypertension, diabetes, gestational week, smoking, alcohol use, and educational level. Parental ages were also entered as continuous variables, and interaction terms were tested. Restricted cubic splines were applied to assess nonlinear dose-response relationships. Results: Compared with the equal-age group, both the father-older group (OR = 1.561, 95% CI: 1.203-3.201) and the mother-older group (OR = 1.652, 95% CI: 1.323-2.343) had significantly increased odds of neonatal diseases. After further adjustment for individual parental ages, the father-older association became non-significant (OR = 1.121, Conclusion: Both maternal and paternal ages are independent risk factors with nonlinear dose-response relationships. The combined structure of parental ages should be considered in preconception counseling and perinatal risk assessment.

Indexed as

age gapneonatal healthparental ageperinatal outcomesretrospective cohort study

Identifiers

PMID42440843
PMCPMC13333766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.