ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Outcomes of Surgical Site Infection Following Cranial Surgery From a UK Tertiary Center.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The evidence guiding management of cranial surgical site infections (SSIs) is sparse with limited data on optimal duration of antimicrobial therapy. There is a lack of published data on the approach to and outcomes of cranial SSI management. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients from Oxford University Hospitals, United Kingdom, requiring revision surgery for SSI following primary craniotomy, craniectomy, and cranioplasty between January 2019 and April 2022 and reviewed outcomes at 24 months. Data were collected on patient characteristics, diagnosis, management, and outcome. Analysis was performed in R. Results: Of 94 patients included, 44% were male and the median age was 51 years (IQR, 42-63). During surgical inspection, 40% of infections involved only superficial structures, 33% the extradural space, and 27% extended to the subdural space. Conclusions: These findings underscore the complexity of cranial SSIs and variation in presentation. Failure in this cohort was not uncommon, and practitioners should be particularly vigilant in the management of "superficial" infections. Developing a national consensus guideline would be an important step toward standardizing care and improving patient outcomes in this challenging cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.