ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Machine learning combined with resting-state functional MRI to characterize functional brain differences in post-stroke depression.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-stroke depression (PSD) is a common neuropsychiatric condition after stroke, but its resting-state functional imaging correlates remain incompletely characterized. This study examined multi-level resting-state functional differences between patients with PSD and healthy controls and evaluated whether interpretable machine learning could identify candidate imaging features associated with PSD. Methods: Fifty patients with PSD and 50 age- and sex-matched healthy controls underwent resting-state functional MRI. Four complementary imaging indices were extracted using the AAL atlas: amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF), regional homogeneity (ReHo), degree centrality (DC), and ROI-to-ROI functional connectivity (FC). Imaging features were adjusted for demographic variables, head motion, medication use, and stroke-related factors where appropriate. Candidate features with significant between-group differences were further reduced using LASSO regression. Nine machine-learning classifiers were trained and compared under the same feature-selection framework. Model performance was assessed primarily by ROC-AUC. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to examine the contribution of individual features to the best-performing model. Results: Patients with PSD showed distributed resting-state functional differences involving cingulate, thalamic, prefrontal, insular, posterior default-mode, and visual-associated regions. Twenty-nine candidate features differed between groups, including 7 ReHo, 8 ALFF, 6 DC, and 8 FC features. LASSO retained 10 core features, with a cross-validated AUC of 0.878. Among the nine classifiers, the Extra Trees model achieved the highest independent test-set performance, with an AUC of 0.889. SHAP analysis indicated that the most influential features included DC in the left anterior cingulate and paracingulate gyri, ReHo in the left thalamus, FC between the left precuneus and left calcarine cortex, ALFF in the right precuneus, and ALFF in the left angular gyrus. Within the PSD group, moderate depression was associated with higher ALFF in the left insula and lower precuneus-calcarine connectivity compared with mild depression. Conclusions: Patients with PSD showed multi-level resting-state functional differences compared with healthy controls. Interpretable machine learning identified a set of candidate rs-fMRI features with plausible neurobiological relevance. These findings require validation in larger longitudinal cohorts that include post-stroke patients without depression to clarify their specificity and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.