ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Construction and effect evaluation of a prediction model for malnutrition risk in patients recovering from stroke.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of malnutrition in stroke patients during recovery is high, which seriously affects the rehabilitation outcome. Existing general nutrition screening tools have limited predictive power for this specific population. Purpose: To construct and validate a prediction model specifically for assessing the risk of malnutrition in patients with stroke during recovery. Method: A total of 262 patients with stroke in recovery stage were retrospectively enrolled and divided into training set ( Results: Multivariate analysis identified age, modified Barthel index (MBI) score and albumin level as independent predictors of malnutrition. The AUC of the nomogram model was 0.869 (95%CI: 0.817-0.922) in the training cohort and 0.878 (95%CI: 0.808-0.949) in the validation cohort. The calibration curve showed good agreement between the predicted risk and the actual risk. Conclusion: This study successfully constructed and verified a risk prediction model for malnutrition in stroke recovery patients including age, functional status and albumin level. As a complementary tool to the existing screening method NRS-2002, the model has good predictive power and clinical applicability. It facilitates early identification of high-risk patients and provides an evidence-based approach to individualized nutritional intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.