SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
The outcomes in nephrotoxicity among therapies utilizing three distinct polymyxins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Polymyxin B (PMB), colistin sulfate, and colistimethate sodium (CMS) are key therapies for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections in critically ill patients. However, their comparative nephrotoxicity remains unclear with inconsistent evidence; therefore, this study used a network meta-analysis to systematically compare their renal safety and related clinical outcomes. Methods: Studies comparing PMB, colistin sulfate, and CMS were identified through systematic searches of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases up to April 4, 2026. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the relative risk of nephrotoxicity among the three polymyxin formulations by integrating direct and indirect evidence within a unified analytical framework. Secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality, microbiological eradication, and length of hospital stay. Data were synthesized using fixed- or random-effects models as appropriate, based on the degree of between-study heterogeneity. Results: Compared with patients receiving colistin sulfate, those receiving CMS showed higher estimated odds of nephrotoxicity in both the network analysis (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.31-10.19) and the direct pairwise comparison (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.44-4.22). In contrast, patients receiving PMB did not show a statistically significant difference in nephrotoxicity compared with those receiving colistin sulfate (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68-1.43). In direct comparisons, colistin sulfate cohort was also associated with a lower risk of nephrotoxicity than PMB cohort (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28-0.77). Age- and serum albumin-adjusted analysis and subgroup analysis yielded broadly similar results. For secondary outcomes, patients receiving colistin sulfate or PMB showed higher estimated odds of 28-day mortality compared with those receiving CMS, whereas no statistically significant difference in 28-day mortality was observed between colistin sulfate and PMB cohort. Across treatment comparisons, no significant differences were identified in bacterial clearance or length of hospital stay. Conclusion: This network meta-analysis of observational cohort studies suggests that colistin sulfate may be associated with a lower risk of nephrotoxicity than CMS- and PMB-based therapy. Nevertheless, given the heterogeneity across studies and the potential for residual confounding inherent in observational evidence, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and regarded as hypothesis-generating until further evaluated in well-designed prospective cohort studies or randomized controlled trials. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420261322516.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.