Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42440611›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Benchmark evaluation of multi-modal large language models for ophthalmic diagnosis in real world.

Shoujun Huang, Junhong Chen, Jiaoman Wang, Ping Zhang, Wending Du, Yuan Hong, Dexing Kong, Wei Lou, Mingying Lai, Weihua Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shoujun Huang *College of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Junhong Chen *College of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Jiaoman Wang *Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ping Zhang *Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Wending DuCollege of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Yuan HongCollege of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Dexing KongCollege of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Wei LouCollege of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Mingying LaiShenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Weihua YangShenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly demonstrating substantial potential in the medical domain, particularly in image-intensive specialties such as ophthalmology. Although cutting-edge models like ChatGPT-4o and Qwen-VL 2.5 have shown strong performance on general-domain tasks, real-world clinical benchmarks for rigorously assessing their diagnostic capabilities in specialized medical contexts remain limited. To address this gap, we constructed a carefully curated benchmark dataset comprising 295 pathologically confirmed ophthalmic cases with representative clinical presentations. Using this dataset, we systematically evaluated nine leading MLLMs, including both open-source and proprietary models. The results showed that models such as HAIBU-ReMUD and ChatGPT-4o achieved comparatively strong diagnostic accuracy and consistency, with performance in some settings approaching that of human experts. These findings suggest that current MLLMs are showing encouraging feasibility for real-world clinical applications and provide a basis for further investigation of their integration into ophthalmology practice.

Indexed as

clinical benchmark datasetmedical image diagnosismultimodal large language modelsophthalmologyperformance evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42440611
PMCPMC13333443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.