ReviewHumanities & social sciences communications2026
Social movements and social media: the evolution of scholarship in the age of datafication.
Review in Humanities & social sciences communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social movements and social media: the evolution of scholarship in the age of datafication.Humanities & social sciences communications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evolution of social movements in the age of datafication has challenged prevailing social movement theories. Contrary to scholarly forecasts, datafication empowered social movements by reducing the cost of participation and removing barriers to disseminating information, while also facilitating authoritarianism and imposing new constraints on movements' organizational dynamics and long-term impact. While literature reviews of the field suggest that these gaps have largely been overcome, little is known about how the field as a whole has evolved to address these questions. Using bibliometric tools to visualize and analyze a dataset of 6701 studies on social media and social movements published between 2005 and 2023, we identify the canonical literature, research approaches, and research methods used to study these developments. Our findings highlight a consistent scarcity in experimental research that isolates causal mechanisms, and we point to experimental work in related fields that could advance this line of research. We conclude by discussing opportunities for next-step research that emerge from our findings, including the use of big data analysis as well as qualitative and experimental studies to address unresolved questions about social movements in the age of datafication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.