ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Case Report: FOLFOX-induced vulvar mucositis: a rare side effect of 5-FU.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute vulvar mucocutaneous reactions during fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy are extremely rare. We describe the case of a 53-year-old woman diagnosed with stage IIA rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant modified FOLFOX-6 (mFOLFOX-6) chemotherapy who developed an acute vulvar mucocutaneous reaction after one cycle of chemotherapy. Treatment was initiated with low-potency topical steroid cream without resolution and progressive pain requiring treatment intensification with high-potency topical steroid cream, topical lidocaine, and topical vaginal estradiol. Given the temporal association with chemotherapy and clinical features suggestive of a drug-related mucocutaneous reaction, possibly consistent with fixed drug eruption, the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus was omitted from subsequent cycles, allowing completion of all rounds of planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy without recurrence. This case expands the spectrum of known mucocutaneous toxicities associated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy and demonstrates that the omission of the 5-FU bolus preserves treatment efficacy while preventing the recurrence of this rare toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.