Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42440495›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Case Report: FOLFOX-induced vulvar mucositis: a rare side effect of 5-FU.

Magali de Sauvage, Jeffrey Patterson-Fortin

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Magali de SauvageDivision of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Jeffrey Patterson-FortinDivision of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute vulvar mucocutaneous reactions during fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy are extremely rare. We describe the case of a 53-year-old woman diagnosed with stage IIA rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant modified FOLFOX-6 (mFOLFOX-6) chemotherapy who developed an acute vulvar mucocutaneous reaction after one cycle of chemotherapy. Treatment was initiated with low-potency topical steroid cream without resolution and progressive pain requiring treatment intensification with high-potency topical steroid cream, topical lidocaine, and topical vaginal estradiol. Given the temporal association with chemotherapy and clinical features suggestive of a drug-related mucocutaneous reaction, possibly consistent with fixed drug eruption, the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus was omitted from subsequent cycles, allowing completion of all rounds of planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy without recurrence. This case expands the spectrum of known mucocutaneous toxicities associated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy and demonstrates that the omission of the 5-FU bolus preserves treatment efficacy while preventing the recurrence of this rare toxicity.

Indexed as

5-Fu (5-Fluorouracil)adverse eventmucositisrectal cancerside effectvulvar mucous membrane

Identifiers

PMID42440495
PMCPMC13333402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.