ArticleSurgical case reports2026
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Hartmann's Reversal Using the Stoma Site in a Patient with Perioperative Anaphylaxis.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionReversal of Hartmann's procedure is associated with substantial morbidity, and further reduction of surgical invasiveness may be beneficial in selected patients. Perioperative anaphylaxis caused by anesthetic agents or skin antiseptics poses a significant challenge to surgical management. We report a case of stoma-site single-incision laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal (HR) performed in a patient with severe perioperative allergies. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73-year-old woman underwent an emergency open Hartmann's procedure with partial cystectomy for perforated sigmoid colon cancer with bladder invasion. After adjuvant chemotherapy, she developed a progressively enlarging giant parastomal hernia that significantly impaired daily activities. Two attempts at HR were aborted because of perioperative anaphylactic shock. Subsequent allergy evaluations suggested rocuronium and chlorhexidine as causative agents, and povidone-iodine was also avoided based on clinical history. Approximately 14 months after the initial surgery, single-incision laparoscopic HR using the stoma site was successfully performed under general anesthesia without neuromuscular blocking agents. Preoperative skin antisepsis was performed using benzalkonium chloride, avoiding both chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine. No additional abdominal incisions were required. The operative time was 2 h 56 min, with minimal blood loss. The postoperative course was uneventful and she was discharged on POD 9.
conclusionsStoma-site single-incision laparoscopic HR may represent a useful surgical option for selected patients with severe perioperative allergies to anesthetic agents and skin antiseptics, in whom minimizing abdominal approach and wound-related risks is particularly important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.