ArticleJAMA network open2026
Neonatal Outcomes Following Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Use During Pregnancy.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Evaluating the safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) during pregnancy is challenging due to ethical barriers to randomized trials and potential confounding in observational studies. Objective: To compare neonatal outcomes for pregnancies with SSRI continuation vs those with SSRI discontinuation using a target trial framework. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study comprised target trials using electronic health records of linked mothers and neonates from a single academic center. The periconception trial examined congenital anomalies with first-trimester exposure, and the early-pregnancy trial evaluated nonanomaly outcomes with first- or second-trimester exposure. Participants were women with singleton pregnancies (2006 to 2022) with SSRI use within the 2 years before conception and at least 1 prenatal visit during the first trimester (periconception trial) or during the first or second trimester (early-pregnancy trial). Data were analyzed from May 2022 to December 2023. Exposure: SSRI continuation vs discontinuation during pregnancy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Apgar scores, meconium in amniotic fluid, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, preterm birth, birth weight, respiratory distress, feeding problems, hypoglycemia, hypothermia, pulmonary hypertension, cesarean delivery, and congenital anomalies. Results: The early-pregnancy trial included 1014 pregnancies (mean [SD] maternal age, 30.3 [5.4] years). The periconception trial included 807 pregnancies (mean [SD] maternal age, 30.4 [5.5] years). SSRI continuation was associated with lower Apgar scores at 1 minute (mean difference [MD], -0.39; 95% CI, -0.60 to -0.18) and 5 minutes (MD, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.42 to -0.13), and increased risk of meconium in amniotic fluid (odds ratio [OR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.45). No significant associations were found for congenital anomalies (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.90), though this result should be interpreted with caution given limited sample size. No differences were found for neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.83) or other outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, SSRI continuation during pregnancy was associated with impaired neonatal adaptation but not with severe complications or NICU admission. These findings highlight the importance of appropriate comparator selection to minimize confounding and illustrate how target trial emulation can improve causal inference in studies of medication safety during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.