ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026
A Socioeconomic Vulnerability Index for Persons with Disabilities via Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Employment is a key social determinant of health, yet people with disabilities (PWDs) face persistent disparities in vocational rehabilitation (VR) services and outcomes. Federally funded Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) programs serve individuals whose disabilities create barriers to competitive integrated employment, yet service allocation and outcomes vary widely across socioeconomic contexts. Understanding how cumulative socioeconomic disadvantage shapes VR service delivery and employment outcomes is essential for advancing equity. Using Rehabilitation Service Administration (RSA-9/11) data (n = 182,266), machine learning methods, including principal component analysis (PCA), were applied to develop a Socioeconomic Vulnerability Index, which was then used to examine associations with VR service delivery and employment outcomes. Results revealed that higher vulnerability was linked to increased likelihood of receiving basic support services but lower odds of career-oriented services. Higher vulnerability index scores correlated with higher expenditures (+ $246) yet substantially lower wages (- $3.13/hour). Findings suggest that an intake‑level vulnerability screening tool could support risk stratification and more targeted, equity‑focused VR service planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42440257What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.