Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42440219›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2026

Hidden burden of leprosy in incarcerated populations in northeast Brazil: active case detection and serological assessment.

Thatiane Silva de Lucena, Lorena Covre Galani, Luize Dianin Barbosa, Gabriela Ferreira Dias, Jaci Maria Santana, Filipe Rocha Lima, Marco Andrey Cipriani Frade

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thatiane Silva de Lucena *National Referral Center for Sanitary Dermatology focusing on Leprosy, Clinical Hospital of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5321-1870
Lorena Covre Galani *National Referral Center for Sanitary Dermatology focusing on Leprosy, Clinical Hospital of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3760-829X
Luize Dianin BarbosaNational Referral Center for Sanitary Dermatology focusing on Leprosy, Clinical Hospital of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9036-6594
Gabriela Ferreira DiasLaboratory for Skin Studies and Alternative Models, Department of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1033-0507
Jaci Maria SantanaNational Referral Center for Sanitary Dermatology focusing on Leprosy, Clinical Hospital of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2582-3751
Filipe Rocha Lima *National Referral Center for Sanitary Dermatology focusing on Leprosy, Clinical Hospital of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. filipelima@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7629-4963
Marco Andrey Cipriani Frade *Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. mandrey@fmrp.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2700-5971

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeprosy remains a public health challenge in Brazil's Northeast, where prison overcrowding may facilitate transmission. Limited data exist on leprosy screening strategies in incarcerated populations.

methodsThis observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at Baldomero Cavalcante Male Penitentiary in Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil. A total of 915 inmates were approached using the Leprosy Suspicion Questionnaire (LSQ) as an active case-finding tool. Neurodermatological examinations were performed on 260 participants, and serological testing for anti-PGL-I (IgM) and anti-Mce1A antibodies (IgA, IgM, IgG) was conducted on 244 plasma samples using indirect ELISA.

resultsOf 842/915 returned questionnaires (92%), 240/842 (28.5%) were positive in the LSQ. Clinical examination revealed 8 new leprosy cases among 260/842 evaluated inmates with positive and negative LSQ, yielding an overall new case detection rate (NCDR) of 3.08%, which increased to 6.52% among symptomatic individuals. All diagnosed patients were classified as having multibacillary disease, with 100% presenting some grade of physical disability at diagnosis, and 75% LSQ were positive (p = 0.0249), while only 34.1% in the non-leprosy group. Anti-Mce1A IgM showed 37.7% seropositivity rate, and 19.9% for anti-PGL-I among clinically unaffected individuals. IgA (100%), IgM (37.5%), and IgG (25%) anti-Mce1A antibodies were positive in the leprosy group.

conclusionsThe LSQ may be effective as a screening tool. The study confirms significant underdiagnosis of leprosy in prison populations and highlights that anti-Mce1A serology showed higher positivity among diagnosed cases than anti-PGL-I, particularly for the detection of early-stage and neural forms of the disease. These findings support enhanced active surveillance strategies in high-risk populations to achieve leprosy elimination goals.

Indexed as

Active case findingHansen’s diseaseLeprosyPrison populationSerological screening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.