ReviewDrugs2026
Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptide Treatment of Invasive Gram-Positive Infections.
Review in Drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gram-positive infections continue to pose a therapeutic challenge owing to their invasive nature (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes) and eradication difficulties (e.g., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA] and vancomycin-resistant enterococci [VRE]). Long-acting lipoglycopeptides (laLGPs) present an effective and conveniently dosed option for the treatment of most invasive Gram-positive pathogens. Improved compliance monitoring associated with their infrequent intravenous dosing, that is not available to such degree with more frequently dosed antimicrobials outside of inpatient settings, is another benefit of laLGPs over more frequently dosed antimicrobials. In this article, we provide a narrative review, including the pharmacological characteristics of dalbavancin (DAL) and oritavancin (ORI), the only currently available laLGPs, as well as their approved and "off-label" use reported in the literature to date. We discuss their respective mechanism of action, caveats in compartments where they do not achieve sufficient concentrations (i.e., central nervous system [CNS]; potentially pneumonias with ORI), as well as their reported efficacy in individual organ systems as reported in literature. Lastly, we summarize insights about laLGP use in special populations and discuss the benefits of therapeutic drug monitoring of these agents, mainly in conditions requiring prolonged therapy (e.g., hardware-associated orthopedic infections).
Indexed as
Identifiers
42440168What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.