ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
A randomised controlled feasibility trial of guided parent-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for children's perfectionism.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Perfectionism (CBT-P) for children delivered as an online 6-session guided parent-delivered intervention (GP-CBT-P). We conducted a two-arm randomised controlled trial comparing GP-CBT-P to waitlist for parents whose child was aged 7-12 and had elevated perfectionism. Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability; secondary outcomes were self-reported parental and child perfectionism, school satisfaction, happiness, stress, depressive symptoms, self-efficacy, and weight/shape concern. Assessment occurred at baseline (T1), 9- (T2, end of the intervention) and 18-weeks (T3) post-randomization. There were 89 enquiries over 14 months; 49 (54%) converted to randomisation (25 in GP-CBT-P, 24 in waitlist), and 60% of parents in the intervention group completed all 6 sessions. There were no differences between groups at baseline. Intent-to-treat analysis showed parents in GP-CBT-P had significantly lower levels of perfectionism at T2 and T3 than control (respective between groups effect sizes [ES] and 95% confidence intervals [CI] of 0.95 [0.37 to 1.53] and 0.65 [0.08 to 1.21]). Compared to control, children receiving GP-CBT-P reported significantly higher school satisfaction and academic self-efficacy, and lower stress, depression and weight/shape concerns; T3 ES ranged from 0.58 to 0.82. There were no significant differences between groups on child perfectionism. GP-CBT-P could benefit from strategies to enhance feasibility and acceptability given it promoted helpful change across parent and child self-reported outcomes. Reducing parental perfectionism may be a key driver of beneficial change in children. Further investigation with larger samples and longer-term follow-up is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42440146What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.