Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42440131›Full record

ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2026

Overcoming the limits of traditional rate calculations from sparse concentration data: a probabilistic framework for bioprocess modeling.

Anne Richelle, David Andersson, Anton Vernersson, Olivier Cloarec, Johan Trygg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Hybrid Modeling Framework for Predictive Digital Twins of CHO Cell Culture.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne RichelleSartorius Corporate Research, Brussels, Belgium. anne.richelle@sartorius.com.
David AnderssonSartorius Corporate Research, Umeå, Sweden.
Anton VernerssonSartorius Corporate Research, Umeå, Sweden.
Olivier CloarecSartorius Corporate Research, Aubagne, France.
Johan TryggSartorius Corporate Research, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate estimation of growth and metabolic rates is essential for understanding and optimizing bioprocesses, yet traditional methods often fail when faced with sparse or noisy concentration data. We present MetRaC, a probabilistic framework based on Bayesian inference and Nested Sampling that addresses these challenges by integrating biological knowledge directly into the model structure. The approach transforms raw concentration measurements into pseudo-concentrations that account for distortions caused by bioreactor volume changes (e.g., feed additions, sample withdrawals), and models metabolic rates as linear combinations of basis functions to yield continuous rate profiles from discrete data. Using in-silico simulations, we evaluated the framework under a range of experimental conditions and compared its performance with a conventional rate calculation method. We further analyzed the influence of key experimental design parameters - sampling frequency, sample volume, and measurement noise - on both rate estimation accuracy and concentration reconstruction quality. Results demonstrate that the proposed framework delivers accurate, robust metabolic rate estimates even under severe data sparsity and noise, offering a powerful tool for improving bioprocess characterization and optimization.

Indexed as

BioreactorsComputer SimulationModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsBayes TheoremBayesian inferenceBioprocessMetabolic rateNested sampling

Identifiers

PMID42440131
PMCPMC13424222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.