ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026
ShRed: a machine learning model developed to predict shoulder redislocation.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis feasibility study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning models to predict shoulder redislocation using joint-specific imaging characteristics, in addition to traditional demographic variables.
methodsA prospective dataset from a tertiary referral centre was analysed, including cartilage MRI thickness measurements. Six classification algorithms were compared using 10-fold stratified cross-validation as the primary evaluation method. Preprocessing involved one-hot encoding of categorical variables and median imputation for missing values. The dataset was stratified into training (80%) and testing (20%) subsets.
resultsA total of 42 patients (54.8% redislocation rate) were included. Random Forest demonstrated the highest cross-validated accuracy of 79.0% (± 16.1%), precision of 88.3%, recall of 75.0%, and AUC of 0.84, with a 95% confidence interval of 69.0% to 89.0%. Feature importance analysis identified years since first dislocation as the most influential predictor, followed by age at first dislocation and glenoid cartilage thickness.
conclusionThis feasibility study demonstrates that machine learning models can predict shoulder redislocation with moderate accuracy. External validation on larger, multicentre datasets is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42440126What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.