ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026
Unlocking herpes zoster vaccination value in Finland: return on investment and actuarial model.
Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHerpes zoster (HZ) is common in Finland, leading to long-term postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) especially with ageing. HZ reduces productivity, placing an economic burden on society. An integrated actuarial and macroeconomic model assessed the return on investment of recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in Finland for adults ≥ 50 years versus no vaccination.
methodsA validated economic model determined HZ cases and complications avoided, health gains (quality-adjusted life-years, QALYs), and healthcare cost-savings. Actuarial techniques projected population trends incorporating employment factors. Lost productivity averted through vaccination provided fiscal revenue for the government, and increased gross domestic product (GDP) for society. QALY gains were monetised using 1-3xGDP per QALY. RZV was administered for 20 years, with lifetime impact assessment.
resultsRZV vaccination of around 790,000 50year-olds was estimated to save 3,779 QALYs and €52 million (M) in healthcare costs. Averted productivity losses generated €152 M in fiscal revenue and €367 M in GDP, while vaccination costs were €236 M. From the fiscal perspective, 90% of vaccination costs were offset by fiscal and healthcare cost savings (without considering QALY gains). From the societal perspective, for every €1 invested in vaccination, €2.60-4.10 was saved (depending on QALY value). The benefit-cost ratio (BCR) remained positive across sensitivity analyses. The highest BCRs were achieved when vaccinating adults aged 50 years; or 65 years when excluding productivity benefits.
conclusionRZV vaccination in working-age adults yielded economic benefits in Finland, generating €2.60-4.10 for society per €1 invested in vaccination, and with fiscal benefits offsetting 90% of vaccination costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42440058What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.