ArticleBiological cybernetics2026
A three-component dynamical index of consciousness-related neural organisation.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantifying consciousness from brain activity remains a major challenge in neuroscience and clinical practice. Many existing EEG measures focus on a single feature of neural activity, such as complexity, synchrony, or spectral structure, but no single feature appears sufficient across different brain states. We introduce a composite dynamical framework that combines three complementary properties of brain activity, i.e., scale-free temporal organisation, cross-frequency organisation, and metastable flexibility in large-scale synchronisation. These components are normalised and combined into a single index designed to capture organised dynamical complexity rather than raw signal complexity alone. We test the framework in both synthetic and empirical settings. In a generative model of nine EEG-like brain states, including wakefulness, dreaming, anaesthesia, non-conscious states, and seizure states, the index separates the synthetic conscious and non-conscious classes without overlap and remains stable across ablation, sensitivity, and Monte Carlo analyses. We then apply the framework to two-channel Sleep-EDF recordings from 30 healthy adults, where it provides a proof-of-principle subject-level separation of wakefulness from N2 and REM sleep. The framework is dynamical-systems-inspired and is not committed to any single theory of consciousness, making it compatible with a range of theoretical perspectives. With further validation, the framework may be applicable across multichannel brain recordings, including anaesthesia, disorders of consciousness, and basic consciousness-research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.