Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42439946›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2026

The behavioral evidence of processing congruences and incongruences between Self- and Other-perspective-related representations during both perspective judgments.

Anna Gunia, Adam Kalina, Alena Javůrková, Kamil Vlček

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna GuniaInstitute of Physiology, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. anna.gunia@fgu.cas.cz.
Adam KalinaDepartment of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Alena JavůrkováDepartment of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Kamil VlčekInstitute of Physiology, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. Kamil.Vlcek@fgu.cas.cz.

Funding

ERDF-Project Brain Dynamics CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004643The Czech Science Foundation 22-16874SThe Grant Agency of Charles University GAUK 254422The Johannes Amos Comenius Programme (OP JAC) provided by MSMT CZ.02.01.01/00/23_025/0008715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Daily, we make visuospatial self-perspective judgments from our actual perspective (SPJ). However, social contexts often require imagining another viewpoint-visuospatial perspective-taking (VPT). VPT is costlier than SPJ, and gets even costlier in autism, schizophrenia, and aging. One explanation is interference from self-related representations. This interference may reflect a mechanism that processes various self- and other-related representations, supported by the temporoparietal junction (TPJ). Moreover, reportedly other-related representations also influence SPJ, though this remains debated. An additional explanation for VPT difficulty in literature is the mental body-schema transformation needed to adopt another perspective at greater angular disparities between perspectives. However, studies often confounded angle with left/right representational incongruence between perspectives. In our previous iEEG study, we found robust TPJ activity during both SPJ and VPT, possibly reflecting the processing of self-other representations. To test whether self-other representations are processed during both perspective judgments, we analyzed behavioral data from the same participants. We categorized trials by an object's left/right congruence between the perspectives. We hypothesized that if self-other representations are processed during both judgments, participants will show greater difficulty in incongruent vs. congruent scenarios during SPJ and VPT. Linear mixed model analysis confirmed this: for both SPJ and VPT, errors were higher on incongruent than congruent trials. These findings show that self-other representations are processed in both SPJ and VPT, and incongruent ones cause interference, highlight left/right congruence as a key factor in VPT studies, and motivate further research with a similar approach on TPJ's role in processing multimodal self-other representations.

Indexed as

JudgmentSelf ConceptSocial PerceptionSpace PerceptionTemporal LobeVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleParietal LobeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42439946
PMCPMC13364830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.