ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Surgical treatment options for soft tissue sarcomas : Indications, diagnostics, techniques, and limitations].
Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas are rare, heterogeneous mesenchymal malignancies with variable prognosis. Management requires structured diagnostics and interdisciplinary treatment at specialized centers. Imaging with MRI or CT and a carefully planned biopsy are essential for diagnosis and surgical strategy. In curative settings, complete R0 resection is the primary goal, while metastatic disease requires an individualized approach. Low-grade sarcomas are often treated with marginal resection, whereas high-grade tumors require multimodal therapy including neoadjuvant treatment, wide resection, and adjuvant radiotherapy. Surgical margins depend mainly on anatomical barriers. Functional outcomes and reconstruction are key considerations. Limb preservation is usually achievable, while amputation is rarely necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42439936What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.