Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42439933›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026

Efficacy and safety of amantadine in the treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ahmed Mostafa Amin, Muataz Kashbour, Ahmed Fawzy Alsokery, Ahmed Nady, Mohamed Wagdy, Ahmed ElSayed Awadallah, Ahmed Reda Aboyadak, Mostafa Meshref

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmed Mostafa AminFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7065-381X
Muataz KashbourDiagnostic Radiology Department, National Cancer Institute, Misrata, Libya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5624-0017
Ahmed Fawzy AlsokeryFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6104-7798
Ahmed NadyFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4080-4154
Mohamed WagdyFaculty of Medicine, Modern University for Technology and Information, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0891-3561
Ahmed ElSayed AwadallahFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1268-3649
Ahmed Reda AboyadakFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mostafa MeshrefDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. MostafaMahmoud.236@azhar.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0692-6309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory condition that leads to the gradual loss of myelin in the central nervous system. Approximately half of MS patients experience fatigue that hinders daily activities and impairs quality of life. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of amantadine in the treatment of fatigue in MS. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search across four electronic databases. We retrieved the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of amantadine versus placebo for the treatment of fatigue in MS. Ten RCTS were included with a total of 1210 patients. Patients treated with amantadine had a significant improvement in fatigue compared to the placebo, according to the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and self-reported treatment response (MD = - 0.53, p < 0.001), (RR = 1.73, p < 0.001), respectively. While there is no significant difference in the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) (P = 0.40) between the two groups. Amantadine also improved walking speed as measured by Timed 25-foot Walk (MD = 0.18, p = 0.03). Regarding safety, there were no significant differences between groups in the overall risk of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (p = 0.07). However, amantadine was associated with a higher risk of discontinuation related to TEAE (p < 0.001), constipation (p = 0.04), hallucinations (p = 0.05), and mouth dryness (p < 0.001). Amantadine was associated with modest improvements in fatigue and mobility outcomes; however, the overall clinical benefit is offset by an increased risk of adverse events, notably any TEAE leading to study drug discontinuation, any drug-related TEAE, constipation, hallucinations, and mouth dryness.

Indexed as

AmantadineFatigueFatigue Severity ScaleMeta-analysisMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.