ArticleArchives of microbiology2026
Comparison of physical preservation strategies for accurate characterization of the coffee fruit microbiome.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The method used to preserve samples prior to DNA extraction is crucial for the accurate characterization of microbial diversity. This study evaluated the effects of different storage conditions on microbial DNA preservation in Coffea arabica fruit samples. Coffee cherries were harvested directly from plants, placed in plastic tubes, and stored at 4 °C before being subjected to four treatments: lyophilization, cryopreservation at - 80 °C, and refrigeration at 4 °C. Samples were stored for 3 and 13 days. Microbial communities were characterized by next-generation sequencing. Lyophilization retained more than 80% of the ASVs shared between days 3 and 13 of storage, whereas refrigeration at 4 °C retained less than 50%. These findings demonstrate that preservation method significantly affects the integrity of bacterial and fungal microbiomes in C. arabica beans. The absence of a time-zero control, chemical preservative comparisons, and the study's limited scope (single variety, location, and short storage period) warrant cautious interpretation of the findings. Although lyophilization was the best-performing physical preservation strategy evaluated here, broader validation across coffee cultivars, environments, and storage durations is still required before it can be considered a standard preservation protocol for preserving microbial materials derived from coffee samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.