Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42439913›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2026

Comparison of physical preservation strategies for accurate characterization of the coffee fruit microbiome.

Etztli Itzel Morales Reyes, Tomás Gomes Reis Veloso, José Maria Rodrigues da Luz, Monalisa Araujo Aziz, Martín Alejandro Bolaños González, Marliane de Cassia Soares da Silva

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Etztli Itzel Morales ReyesColegio de Postgraduados, Postgrado en Hidrociencias, Campus Montecillo. Carretera México-Texcoco, Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1067-9320
Tomás Gomes Reis VelosoDepartamento de Microbiologia, Laboratory of Mycorrhizal Associations - LAMIC, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Avenida PH Rolfs S/N, Viçosa, Viçosa, CEP, 36570-000, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6704-6505
José Maria Rodrigues da LuzDepartamento de Microbiologia, Laboratory of Mycorrhizal Associations - LAMIC, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Avenida PH Rolfs S/N, Viçosa, Viçosa, CEP, 36570-000, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-7982
Monalisa Araujo AzizLAMIC, DMB, UFV, Ph Rolfs Avenue S/N, Viçosa, 6570-000, Minas Gerais, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4721-7368
Martín Alejandro Bolaños GonzálezColegio de Postgraduados, Postgrado en Hidrociencias, Campus Montecillo. Carretera México-Texcoco, Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8110-1051
Marliane de Cassia Soares da SilvaDepartamento de Microbiologia, Laboratory of Mycorrhizal Associations - LAMIC, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Avenida PH Rolfs S/N, Viçosa, Viçosa, CEP, 36570-000, Minas Gerais, Brazil. marliane.silva@ufv.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4678-7876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The method used to preserve samples prior to DNA extraction is crucial for the accurate characterization of microbial diversity. This study evaluated the effects of different storage conditions on microbial DNA preservation in Coffea arabica fruit samples. Coffee cherries were harvested directly from plants, placed in plastic tubes, and stored at 4 °C before being subjected to four treatments: lyophilization, cryopreservation at - 80 °C, and refrigeration at 4 °C. Samples were stored for 3 and 13 days. Microbial communities were characterized by next-generation sequencing. Lyophilization retained more than 80% of the ASVs shared between days 3 and 13 of storage, whereas refrigeration at 4 °C retained less than 50%. These findings demonstrate that preservation method significantly affects the integrity of bacterial and fungal microbiomes in C. arabica beans. The absence of a time-zero control, chemical preservative comparisons, and the study's limited scope (single variety, location, and short storage period) warrant cautious interpretation of the findings. Although lyophilization was the best-performing physical preservation strategy evaluated here, broader validation across coffee cultivars, environments, and storage durations is still required before it can be considered a standard preservation protocol for preserving microbial materials derived from coffee samples.

Indexed as

BacteriaCoffeaCoffeeFruitMicrobiotaPreservation, BiologicalCryopreservationDNA, BacterialFreeze DryingFungiRefrigerationCoffeeDNA, BacterialCoffee arabicaCryopreservationDNA sequencingLyophilizationMicrobial diversity

Identifiers

PMID42439913
PMCPMC13364879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.